Missouri Supreme Court: Government May Criminalize Truthful, Harmless Information
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 19, 2011
CONTACT: Dave Roland, (314) 604-6621
Missouri Supreme Court: Government May Criminalize Truthful, Harmless Speech
St. Louis, Missouri—On July 19 the Missouri Supreme Court issued its opinion in Kansas City Premier Apartments v. Missouri Real Estate Commission, in which it upheld a state law that criminalizes the communication of truthful, harmless information. Although at trial the government’s own expert witness had testified that KCPA’s speech was both truthful and unlikely to cause any harm to the public, five of the high court’s seven judges ruled that Missouri citizens may not tell others about real estate unless the government has given them special permission to do so.
“The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment protects nude dancing, burning the American flag, and images of animals being crushed to death,” said Dave Roland, director of litigation for the Freedom Center of Missouri, the public interest law firm challenging the speech restrictions. “But today the Missouri Supreme Court has ruled that you can be thrown in jail for helping a friend find an apartment.”
The court’s ruling runs contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent emphasis on protecting free expression. As Judge Michael A. Wolff pointed out in his dissenting opinion, less than one month ago the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Vermont law that prohibited the sale of certain commercial information, powerfully reaffirming the constitutional principles that should have applied to the speech restrictions at issue in this case.
Wolff, whose opinion was joined by Chief Justice Teitelman, also highlighted the government’s failure to identify any likely harm that might justify the prohibition of KCPA’s speech: “If the state wants an injunction limited only to the use of false or deceptive information, the state may be able to make the required showing. But the broad prohibition of this injunction violates the First Amendment.”
The Freedom Center’s executive director Jenifer Zeigler Roland said, “The U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that where the government seeks to restrict speech, it must show evidence as why that restriction is necessary. In this case the government offered no evidence to justify its criminalization of truthful speech. By failing to protect KCPA’s speech, the majority has left all Missourians at the mercy of overzealous bureaucrats.”
The Freedom Center of Missouri plans to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Founded in 2010, the non-profit, St. Louis-based Freedom Center of Missouri represents individuals statewide fighting to defend free speech rights and the right to earn an honest living in the occupations of their choice. Additional information about the Freedom Center’s mission, cases, and activities can be found online at www.mofreedom.org.
# # #
[NOTE: To arrange interviews on this subject, journalists may call Dave Roland at (314) 604-6621.]
2 thoughts on “Missouri Supreme Court: Government May Criminalize Truthful, Harmless Information”
Given the fact that KCPA is a corporation licensed by the STATE, which means, in-effect, that KCPA is a creature (creation) of the STATE; the STATE gives KCPA its marching orders through its agent the Missouri Real Estate Commission, lawfully AND constitutionally.
Like: sit down, shut-up and do as your told!
I don’t see a problem here…maybe because there really isn’t one?
An individual, on the other-hand, who obviously hasn’t sold or contracted his birthright away to the STATE, would have a much different outcome.
The law not only restricts KCPA as a corporation, it restricts any individual who might want to tell others about properties available for sale or rent. The government specifically sought an injunction against Tiffany Lewis and Ryan Gran as individuals. This case is not about whether corporations have rights, it’s about whether the government can criminalize the communication of information that is both truthful and harmless. The Missouri Supreme Court ignored a multitude of U.S. Supreme Court decisions in order to reach today’s conclusion – and that’s something that should worry everyone in the state.